AI Act · Useful governance
The AI Act should not become another compliance binder.
Robinswood helps leaders turn regulatory pressure into operational governance: which uses exist, which are risky, and which deserve industrialization.
Frame my AI uses30 minutes
First goal: know what already exists.
In 30 minutes, we identify your visible and invisible AI uses, then the level of framing needed before going further.
You are concerned if
- employees already use ChatGPT, Copilot or AI tools without a common frame;
- you do not know which uses must be documented;
- IT, business teams and leadership do not read risk the same way;
- you want to avoid a theoretical AI charter no one applies;
- a client, partner or auditor asks for guarantees.
Expected deliverables
- inventory of current or planned AI uses;
- risk classification and areas to frame;
- simple usage rules for teams;
- 30-day governance action register.
Best fit
- leaders who want to frame without slowing down;
- HR, IT, quality or compliance owners;
- SMEs already using AI informally.
Preuve terrain
Practical governance beats a perfect policy
In a multi-site organization, the work started from observed uses: personal accounts, sensitive data copy-paste, local automations. Governance was designed around those frictions, not around an abstract document.
Get a first opinion on your AI constraint
In 30 minutes, the goal is simple: understand your main blockage and decide whether a deeper diagnosis is worth engaging.
Short form
5 fields. Detailed qualification comes later if the topic deserves a conversation.