Strategic issue
Increase processing capacity without adding manual coordination, while retaining control of data and sensitive decisions.
Composite example · no client data
What leadership gets from the €5,000 audit.
This example combines typical situations. Names, figures and circumstances are fictional or composite: no metric is presented as an observed client result.
Multi-site B2B service company · illustrative situation
Process studied
Request → qualification → collection → preparation → approval → delivery → invoicing.
Critical point
Information reconstruction and approval between preparation and delivery concentrate waiting time and delay invoicing.
Decision to make
Determine whether the answer is primarily process change, a business tool or a combined path.
Illustrative baseline
- Preparation time per case
- Number of information handoffs
- Approval lead time
- Invoicing trigger method
Two possible paths after the audit
- 1Tool path: build or integrate from €15,000 excl. tax
- 2Advisory path: transform operations from €20,000 excl. tax
- 3Combined path: priced according to scope
- 4Documented stop when value does not justify investment
Decision criterion
Expected economic gain, adoption conditions and system control must justify what comes next.
Metrics and targets are established during the audit. No composite figure is presented as client proof.